by shuxiachai
Turn any research paper into a commercialization report — 6 AI agents, TRL/MRL scoring, patent landscape, market intelligence, verified citations. DeepSeek / OpenAI / Claude.
# Add to your Claude Code skills
git clone https://github.com/shuxiachai/academic-commercialization-agentGuides for using ai agents skills like academic-commercialization-agent.
academic-commercialization-agent is an open-source ai agents skill for AI coding assistants such as Claude Code, Codex CLI, and ChatGPT, built by shuxiachai. Turn any research paper into a commercialization report — 6 AI agents, TRL/MRL scoring, patent landscape, market intelligence, verified citations. DeepSeek / OpenAI / Claude. It has 59 GitHub stars.
academic-commercialization-agent's catalog security scan is still queued. You can run an instant dependency and prompt-injection check now with the "Scan for vulnerabilities" button above.
Clone the repository with "git clone https://github.com/shuxiachai/academic-commercialization-agent" and add it to your Claude Code skills directory (see the Installation section above).
academic-commercialization-agent is primarily written in Python. It is open-source under shuxiachai on GitHub, so you can review or fork the full source.
Yes. SkillsLLM lists many other AI Agents skills you can browse and compare side by side. Open the AI Agents category from the badge at the top of this page, or use the Related Skills and comparison links further down to weigh academic-commercialization-agent against similar tools.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Unlocks once the catalog security scan passes (runs nightly).
The deep catalog scan for this skill is still queued. Run an instant dependency check now instead.
Turn any research paper or topic into a commercialization readiness report in minutes — six AI agents gather academic, patent, and market evidence, then produce a scored report with verifiable citations.
A multi-agent system built on CrewAI that evaluates the commercialization readiness of academic research.
Input a research direction or paper topic. Six specialized AI agents automatically gather evidence from academic literature, patent databases, and market intelligence sources, then produce a structured commercialization assessment report with verifiable citations and a quantitative scorecard.
| Original demo | This project | |
|---|---|---|
| Agents | 2 (researcher + reporting_analyst) | 6 (specialized roles) |
| Tasks | 2 | 6 (sequential + guardrail validation) |
| Tools | None | OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar + SerperDevTool + Crossref |
| Source collection | None | Deterministic pre-run retrieval with URL reachability check |
| Output format | Free-form text | Markdown report with [A1][P2][M3] inline citations + References block + JSON scorecard |
| Output management | Fixed filename (overwritten) | Unique run ID per execution, stored in outputs/ |
| Data quality | None | Structured evidence + citation integrity check + minimum summary length filter + auto-retry |
| Score reproducibility | — | JSON-mode agents all at temperature=0; same topic produces stable results across runs |
| Score traceability | — | Each dimension records source IDs (trl_source_ids, patent_source_ids, etc.) |
Agent 1: Academic Literature Analyst
Sources: OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar papers (pre-validated in Step 0)
Output: Structured EvidenceReport JSON — maturity, breakthroughs, citations (A1/A2/…)
Agent 2: Patent Landscape Analyst
Sources: Google Patents / WIPO records (Serper search + URL validation)
Output: Structured EvidenceReport JSON — holders, white spaces (P1/P2/…)
Agent 3: Market & Competitive Intelligence Analyst
Sources: Domain-allowlisted market reports (Serper search)
Output: Structured EvidenceReport JSON — players, target industries, opportunities (M1/M2/…)
Agent 4: Technology Commercialization Report Writer
Tools: None (uses Agents 1–3 output as context only)
Output: Markdown draft with inline citations [A1][P2][M3] and References block
Guard: Section structure + citation integrity; auto-retries up to 2×
Agent 5: Report Reviewer
Tools: None (uses Agent 4 draft as input)
Rules: 6 rules — citation integrity, unsupported numeric claims, overconfident
language, patent legal framing, evidence consistency, TRL label consistency
Output: Corrected final report; Reviewer Notes saved separately (only actual changes logged)
Agent 6: Commercialization Readiness Scorer
Tools: None (reads Tasks 1–3 evidence JSON directly, independent of the report)
Output: CommercializationScore JSON — TRL / MRL / Patent / Market / Evidence confidence
Guard: JSON format validation + hallucinated source ID check + weighted formula
correction; auto-retries up to 2×
Agents 1–3 run in parallel (async_execution=True), reducing total pipeline time.
Step 0 Source collection & validation (subprocess, deterministic)
Academic: OpenAlex Works API (filter=title.search, sorted by citation count)
→ Semantic Scholar supplement (when OpenAlex count is below target)
→ DOI deduplication; summaries < 100 chars auto-rejected
→ Concurrent Crossref citation-count backfill (ThreadPoolExecutor)
Patent: Serper (3-attempt retry with exponential backoff) → Google Patents / WIPO;
URL reachability verified; patent hosts short-circuited
Market: Serper + domain allowlist (30+ approved institutions); low-quality sites removed
Metadata: Crossref API for DOI, journal name, publication date
Output: validated_sources.json + status.json passed to subprocess pipeline
Steps 1–3 Agents 1/2/3 — Academic / Patent / Market analysis (parallel)
Step 4 Agent 4 — Comprehensive report writing (guardrail validates citations)
Step 5 Agent 5 — Quality review (Reviewer Notes saved separately)
Step 6 Agent 6 — Quantitative scoring (independent of report; formula auto-corrected)
The pipeline runs in a subprocess (pipeline_worker.py) so the Gradio UI can cancel it immediately via proc.terminate().
# Academic Commercialization Assessment: <research_topic>
## Executive Summary
## 1. Technology Overview & Maturity
## 2. Patent Landscape & White Spaces
## 3. Target Industries & Use Cases
## 4. Competitive Landscape
## 5. Commercialization Opportunities & Recommendations
## Evidence Limitations
## References
*Reference codes: A = Academic paper · P = Patent · M = Market/industry source*
[A1] … [P1] … [M1] …
Multilingual support: Language is auto-detected from the topic string. Reports in Simplified/Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, and 6 more languages are fully localized — section headings, citation legend, and patent disclaimers all adapt automatically.
The scorecard (commercialization_scores.json) additionally contains: TRL score, patent strength, market accessibility, evidence confidence, overall score, key risks, and key opportunities.
See the examples/ folder for three complete real reports across different industries.
Overall Score: 41.3 / 100 · Biotech profile · TRL 3.3/9 · MRL 2.0/10 · Patent 4.0/5 · Market 2.0/5 · Evidence 3.0/5
Executive Summary
This assessment evaluates single-dose LNP-ABE8e base editing therapy for hemophilia A targeting the F8 Arg2038Cys mutation. The technology demonstrates strong preclinical proof-of-concept with durable factor VIII restoration (83.7 ± 9.1% at 52 weeks, no detectable immune response [A1]) but remains at an early readiness stage with significant clinical development milestones ahead.
1. Technology Overview & Maturity
In vivo adenine base editing via LNP delivery achieved 72 ± 8% on-target A-to-G correction in bulk liver tissue at 4 weeks, with FVIII activity restoration confirmed durable to 52 weeks [A1]. Tail-clip bleeding time normalised to 2.8 ± 0.4 min (wild-type: 2.6 ± 0.3 min) [A1][A2]. No off-target editing or immune response was detected.
TRL 3.3 / 9 — Active R&D with in vivo animal model proof-of-concept; no IND filing or human data available.
2. Patent Landscape & White Spaces
LNP-mediated liver delivery for in vivo base editing is actively patented by Beam Therapeutics, Intellia Therapeutics, and Precision BioSciences [P2][P4]. The specific F8 Arg2038Cys correction approach may represent a differentiated white space, but freedom-to-operate analysis is required before clinical or commercial use [P1][P3].
Evidence Limitations
References
uv sync
Copy .env.example to .env and fill in your keys:
cp .env.example .env
LLM — pick one of:
| Variable | Provider | Default model |
|---|---|---|
DEEPSEEK_API_KEY |
DeepSeek (get key) | deepseek-chat |
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY |
Anthropic Claude (get key) | claude-sonnet-5 |
OPENAI_API_KEY |
OpenAI (get key) | gpt-4o |
Also required:
| Variable | Where to get it |
|---|---|
SERPER_API_KEY |
serper.dev/api-key (free tier: 2 500 queries/month) |
Optional:
| Variable | Purpose |
|---|---|
LLM_PROVIDER |
Override auto-detection: deepseek / `anth |