by RyanAlberts
🏆 Ranked list of 187 AI agent harnesses, plus templates, playbooks, MCP, and learning resources. Rescored weekly.
# Add to your Claude Code skills
git clone https://github.com/RyanAlberts/best-of-Agent-HarnessesGuides for using ai agents skills like best-of-Agent-Harnesses.
Last scanned: 6/14/2026
{
"issues": [],
"status": "PASSED",
"scannedAt": "2026-06-14T08:16:38.877Z",
"npmAuditRan": true,
"pipAuditRan": true,
"promptInjectionRan": true
}See how best-of-Agent-Harnesses compares with popular alternatives.
best-of-Agent-Harnesses is an open-source ai agents skill for AI coding assistants such as Claude Code, Codex CLI, and ChatGPT, built by RyanAlberts. 🏆 Ranked list of 187 AI agent harnesses, plus templates, playbooks, MCP, and learning resources. Rescored weekly. It has 1,372 GitHub stars.
Yes. best-of-Agent-Harnesses passed SkillsLLM's automated security scan — a dependency vulnerability audit plus prompt-injection heuristics — with no high-severity issues. You can read the full report in the Security Report section on this page.
Clone the repository with "git clone https://github.com/RyanAlberts/best-of-Agent-Harnesses" and add it to your Claude Code skills directory (see the Installation section above).
best-of-Agent-Harnesses is primarily written in Python. It is open-source under RyanAlberts on GitHub, so you can review or fork the full source.
Yes. SkillsLLM lists many other AI Agents skills you can browse and compare side by side. Open the AI Agents category from the badge at the top of this page, or use the Related Skills and comparison links further down to weigh best-of-Agent-Harnesses against similar tools.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
30 days in the Featured rail · terms & refunds
⚠️ Third-Party Software Notice
This skill is third-party open-source software developed and hosted independently on GitHub. SkillsLLM is an informational directory and does not control or maintain the underlying repository.
Any security checks, ratings, or warnings displayed by SkillsLLM are automated and limited in scope. They do not constitute a security certification or guarantee that the software is safe, error-free, or free from malicious code, vulnerabilities, compromised dependencies, or prompt-injection risks.
Review the source code, permissions, dependencies, and configuration before installing or running any third-party skill. Use is at your own risk. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, SkillsLLM is not liable for losses arising from third-party software.
Automated security scan — not a certification.
See comparison
A model answers; an agent acts. An agent harness is the runtime that turns one into the other: the model thinks, the harness decides what that thinking is allowed to touch.
Simon Willison's definition of the agent itself is the cleanest: "an LLM agent runs tools in a loop to achieve a goal." The harness is everything around that loop: which tools exist, what needs approval, what the model sees each turn, what survives a crash. Andrej Karpathy named the architecture back in 2023: the model is "the kernel process of a new Operating System", and the harness is the rest of that OS, its scheduler, permissions, and memory. The SWE-agent paper proved the stakes by coining the agent-computer interface: how tools and feedback are presented changes what a model can do, independent of the model. The field's advice has since converged on investing here rather than in framework plumbing, from Anthropic's build-simple guidance to Jerry Liu's argument that the framework era is over and the layers that matter now are skills, tools, and context quality. Those are the layers this list catalogs.
Better models make harnesses more important: more capabilities mean more failure modes, and production needs retry logic, fallbacks, and validation. Harness quality, not just model quality, determines whether agents actually ship. This list ranks projects by relevance to harness concerns (environment, orchestration, lifecycle, guardrails) and by stars/activity.
The benchmark data now backs this up. On SWE-bench Pro, "swapping the agent harness changed pass@1 more than many model upgrades do" (AINews, Aug 8 2026, citing analysis by @joelniklaus). Same model, different harness: 23% to 52% pass@1 on GLM-5.2, and 15% to 36% on Gemma 4 26B. Harness rankings barely transfer across models (rank correlation -0.05), so a small model in the right harness can approach a much larger model in the wrong one.
The gap is widest on long-horizon work. A bare frontier model was verified at about 30% on ARC-AGI-3; Prime Agent's harness took Opus 5 to 95.5%, and the YC Paper Club talk on why the harness matters more than the model (September 2026) walks through how. The gains come from a new class of self-improving harnesses, not from piling on scaffolding: the best of them stay thin and expose only what the model cannot do for itself. And because rankings barely transfer across models, the harness choice is a pairing that must be re-asked whenever the model changes. Who says so, what they measured, and what the claim does not mean is its own page.
That is the problem the MCP server in this repo solves. Point your agent at it and it can call recommend or pick_harness to choose a harness matched to your model and task, instead of inheriting whichever harness someone else benchmarked.
Every project in the list, plotted by adoption surface area (the simplicity ↔ capability axis) against GitHub stars. Colors are categories; the largest projects in each tier are labeled.
The same projects placed by how much unsupervised rope they're designed to give (autonomy) and what happens when a run dies (recovery). In the tables below, ★ marks headless-ready projects and ✱ marks durable ones. Both charts regenerate from the list data on every refresh.
Start with the guide, then the head-to-head decision pages — grounded in the same data as the tables below:
The list tells you which harness to use. These tell you how to set it up. Templates are files you copy into your project; Playbooks walk you through one task, step by step.
Templates