code-review-graph

AI coding tools can end up re-reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code-review-graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree-sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters.

Quick Start

pip install code-review-graph                     # or: pipx install code-review-graph
code-review-graph install          # auto-detects and configures all supported platforms
code-review-graph build            # parse your codebase

One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one, installs platform-native hooks/skills where supported, and injects graph-aware instructions into your platform rules. It auto-detects whether you installed via uvx or pip/pipx and generates the right config. Restart your editor/tool after installing.

To target a specific platform:

code-review-graph install --platform codex       # configure only Codex
code-review-graph install --platform cursor      # configure only Cursor
code-review-graph install --platform claude-code  # configure only Claude Code
code-review-graph install --platform gemini-cli   # configure only Gemini CLI
code-review-graph install --platform kiro         # configure only Kiro
code-review-graph install --platform copilot      # configure only GitHub Copilot (VS Code)
code-review-graph install --platform copilot-cli  # configure only GitHub Copilot CLI

Requires Python 3.10+. For the best experience, install uv (the MCP config will use uvx if available, otherwise falls back to the code-review-graph command directly).

Then open your project and ask your AI assistant:

Build the code review graph for this project

The initial build takes ~10 seconds for a 500-file project. After that, watch mode and supported hooks can keep the graph updated automatically.

How It Works

Your repository is parsed into an AST with Tree-sitter, stored as a graph of nodes (functions, classes, imports) and edges (calls, inheritance, test coverage), then queried at review time to compute the minimal set of files your AI assistant needs to read.

Blast-radius analysis

When a file changes, the graph traces every caller, dependent, and test that could be affected. This is the "blast radius" of the change. Your AI reads only these files instead of scanning the whole project.

Incremental updates in < 2 seconds

When hooks or watch mode are enabled, file saves and supported commit hooks trigger incremental updates. The graph diffs changed files, finds their dependents via SHA-256 hash checks, and re-parses only what changed. A 2,900-file project re-indexes in under 2 seconds.

The monorepo problem, solved

Large monorepos are where token waste is most painful. The graph cuts through the noise — 27,700+ files excluded from review context, only ~15 files actually read.

Broad language coverage + Jupyter notebooks

Parser support covers functions, classes, imports, call sites, inheritance, and test detection across the current parser surface, using Tree-sitter where available and targeted fallbacks where needed. Current support includes Python, JavaScript/TypeScript/TSX, Go, Rust, Java, C/C++, C#, Ruby, Kotlin, Swift, PHP, Scala, Solidity, Dart, R, Perl, Lua/Luau, Objective-C, shell scripts, Elixir, Zig, PowerShell, Julia, ReScript, GDScript, Nix, Verilog/SystemVerilog, SQL, Vue/Svelte SFCs, Astro files parsed through the TypeScript parser, Jupyter/Databricks notebooks (.ipynb), and Perl XS files (.xs).

Add your own language (no fork needed)

If your repo uses a language the parser does not cover yet, drop a languages.toml into .code-review-graph/ mapping file extensions to any grammar bundled in tree_sitter_language_pack, plus the tree-sitter node types for functions, classes, imports, and calls:

[languages.erlang]
extensions = [".erl"]
grammar = "erlang"
function_node_types = ["function_clause"]
class_node_types = ["record_decl"]
import_node_types = ["import_attribute"]
call_node_types = ["call"]

The generic tree-sitter walker handles extraction from there — no code changes, and built-in languages can never be overridden. See docs/CUSTOM_LANGUAGES.md for the schema reference, validation rules, and a worked end-to-end example.

Risk-scored PR reviews in CI (GitHub Action)

The same analysis runs as a composite GitHub Action — and it stays local-first: the knowledge graph is built and queried entirely on your CI runner, with no source code sent to any external service. On each pull request the action posts a single sticky comment with risk-scored functions, affected execution flows, and test gaps, updated in place on every push. An optional fail-on-risk input turns the review into a merge gate.

# .github/workflows/code-review-graph.yml
on:
  pull_request:

permissions:
  contents: read
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: tirth8205/code-review-graph@v2.3.6
        with:
          github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

See docs/GITHUB_ACTION.md for inputs, risk levels, and caching details, or the dogfood workflow this repo runs on itself in .github/workflows/pr-review.yml.

Benchmarks

Headline number: the median per-question token reduction across the 6 repos is ~82x (whole-corpus baseline vs graph query). The frequently quoted 528x is the maximum