Auditable context engineering for AI agents: context optimization, recoverable context compression, receipts, answer verification, and MCP for Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw.
# Add to your Claude Code skills
git clone https://github.com/juyterman1000/entrolyLast scanned: 5/23/2026
{
"issues": [],
"status": "PASSED",
"scannedAt": "2026-05-23T06:34:21.167Z",
"semgrepRan": false,
"npmAuditRan": true,
"pipAuditRan": true
}entroly is an open-source ai agents skill for AI coding assistants such as Claude Code, Codex CLI, and ChatGPT, built by juyterman1000. Auditable context engineering for AI agents: context optimization, recoverable context compression, receipts, answer verification, and MCP for Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw. It has 426 GitHub stars.
Yes. entroly passed SkillsLLM's automated security scan — a dependency vulnerability audit plus prompt-injection heuristics — with no high-severity issues. You can read the full report in the Security Report section on this page.
Clone the repository with "git clone https://github.com/juyterman1000/entroly" and add it to your Claude Code skills directory (see the Installation section above).
entroly is primarily written in Python. It is open-source under juyterman1000 on GitHub, so you can review or fork the full source.
Yes. SkillsLLM lists many other AI Agents skills you can browse and compare side by side. Open the AI Agents category from the badge at the top of this page, or use the Related Skills and comparison links further down to weigh entroly against similar tools.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Entroly should answer three questions quickly: Did it reduce the context? Did that reduction reach a provider-bound request? What evidence and risk remained?
entroly verify-claims # prove the installed trust/recovery path; no API key
entroly simulate # estimate reduction on this repo; no model call
entroly value # print the evidence-classified lifetime value receipt
entroly value --json # the same receipt for CI, audits, or a dashboard
The value receipt deliberately keeps unlike evidence separate:
| Evidence class | What Entroly reports | Dollar claim |
|---|---|---|
| Provider-bound proxy requests | Requests observed, pre/post input-token reduction, active days, and configured model-rate provenance | Modeled API input cost avoided; not an invoice. Unknown/unmatched models remain unpriced |
| SDK, MCP, and npm operations | Local operations and tokens reduced | $0 claimed because delivery to a paid provider is not observable |
| Legacy or unknown-source history | Preserved tokens and operations | $0 claimed; excluded from provider savings |
simulate compares selected context with its stated local 32K dump baseline.
It is a fast estimate, not provider billing or final-answer quality. Once a
request travels through a supported proxy path, entroly value reports
measured pre/post provider-bound token counts and labels the result with the
pricing source and date.
Entroly is much more than a compressor: it also ships memory, recovery, verification, provider controls, security, receipts, and guarded outcome learning. This frozen benchmark isolates one job in that system: choosing the answer-bearing evidence before a model request.
In this frozen retrieval test, Entroly selected 1.02 of 16 passages on average while keeping the answer-bearing passage in 298 of 300 held-out questions. This demonstrates one Context OS primitive: selecting a small evidence set without blindly discarding the passage needed to answer.
Under the hood, traditional BM25 found the passage in 297 of 300 questions
and a local transformer found it in 293 of 300. They disagreed six times;
the guard kept both candidates only on those cases. The point difference was not
statistically conclusive (p=0.21875), and this experiment measures retrieval,
not generated answers, token savings, or production cost.
python -m benchmarks.neural_evidence_frontier verify benchmarks/results/neural_evidence_frontier.json
Audit every trial in under a minute · inspect the raw artifact · submit a counterexample
Entroly is a local Context OS for AI agents. It unifies the full lifecycle of the information surrounding a model request. That makes it the observability, governance, and decision layer around context—not another general-purpose chat runtime.
Frontier models reason. OpenClaw and Hermes run agents. Entroly manages what those agents read, remember, trust, recover, spend, and learn. The same boundary applies to Claude Code and Codex: Entroly augments the agent you already use instead of becoming another chat client.
| Context OS job | What Entroly does |
|---|---|
| Read | Discovers, ranks, deduplicates, compresses, and secures evidence under an explicit budget. |
| Remember | Maintains working, episodic, semantic, checkpoint, and knowledge-vault context locally. |
| Trust | Checks prompts, code, provenance, and generated claims with layered security and verification. |
| Recover | Keeps omitted originals reachable through content-addressed handles and replayable Context Commits. |
| Spend | Preserves cache boundaries, accounts for provider usage, and applies explicit routing and budget policy. |
| Learn | Uses tests, CI, command exits, edits, and user outcomes to improve guarded local policies and skills. |
Most compression tools shrink whatever text the agent already chose. Entroly starts one step earlier: it chooses the highest-value evidence first, compresses only after selection, keeps originals recoverable, then verifies the answer against the evidence.
Use it however you work: wrap your agent, run it as a proxy, plug it in as an MCP server, or import the library.
| What usually breaks AI coding at scale | What Entroly adds |
|---|---|
| Context windows fill with logs, duplicate files, and irrelevant chunks | Budgeted selection that favors answer-critical files, dependency links, failures, and anomalies |
| Token savings look good but quality silently drops | Accuracy-retention benchmarks, receipts, and WITNESS verification |
| Agents lose the exact line, stack tra |