hyperresearch

Hyperresearch turns Claude Code into a deep research agent: one that currently leads the DeepResearch-Bench RACE leaderboard (benchmarked internally). A tier-adaptive 16-step pipeline takes one prompt and produces an adversarially-audited report with full source provenance. Every source it reads lands in a persistent, searchable vault, so each session starts smarter than the last.

Why it wins

• 250+ sources in a single run. The premier scale profile targets 100–130 in the width sweep alone; citation chasing and gap-fill fetches more than double what actually lands in the corpus.
• Every citation is verified before the report ships. A skeptical cite-checker audits whether each cited source actually supports its sentence. Hallucinated quotes and unacknowledged retractions are hard blocks at the gate.
• Syndication doesn't count as consensus. An independence audit clusters derivative copies, so five reprints of one press release argue with the weight of one source.
• Adversarial by construction. Four critics attack every draft in parallel, and a tool-locked patcher can only apply surgical edits. It physically cannot rewrite the report.
• Eight scholarly sources, one query. hpr scholar search hits OpenAlex, Crossref, CORE, DOAB, ClinicalTrials.gov, SEC EDGAR and FRED through one client layer and returns a single list deduplicated by DOI and title. Books, trials and filings come back alongside papers, each tagged so the pipeline knows which is which. The humanities and social sciences are covered on purpose, not as an afterthought.
• Paywalled papers get read, not skimmed. A closed paper normally enters a vault as a 1,500-character abstract that the report then cites as though it had been read. Hyperresearch asks Unpaywall, Europe PMC and CORE for a legal open-access copy and stores the full text instead, even when the publisher blocks the fetch outright. Every substitution is disclosed in the note, the frontmatter, and the CLI output.
• Nothing is thrown away. Every source lands in a searchable markdown-plus-SQLite vault that your next session reuses before it fetches anything new.
• Crashed runs resume. Each run keeps a manifest; run resume picks up at the exact step where it died.
• Scales from 30 minutes to a dissertation. Bounded queries auto-route to a 5-step fast path. Opt-in dissertation runs write 25K–80K words across chapters, from 300–450 sources.

Install

cd your-project
pip install hyperresearch && hyperresearch install

Then /hyperresearch <anything> in Claude Code.

Python 3.11–3.13. (3.14 not yet supported. Use pyenv install 3.13, uv venv -p 3.13, or py -3.13 -m venv .venv.)

Power users: hyperresearch install --global makes /hyperresearch reachable from every Claude Code session anywhere, at the cost of ~15 lines in every session's system reminder. Per-project install (above) keeps unrelated CC sessions clean.

The 16-step research pipeline

The entry skill is a thin router. It pins down the canonical research query, then invokes one step skill per phase via Claude Code's Skill tool. Each step's procedure loads into context only when that step actually runs. That's what stops a long pipeline from quietly dropping steps as its context rots.

Tiers and gears: the two scale levers

Tiers route per query. Step 1 auto-classifies light vs full. dissertation is opt-in only; ask for it in your prompt.

Gears set the scale of the standard pipeline: the source targets, depth budgets, and word targets rendered into the step skills.

hyperresearch profile list           # all profiles + descriptions + current gear
hyperresearch profile use premier    # 100–130 sources, doubled depth budget (~3–5 h)
hyperresearch profile use full       # back to the 55–80-source baseline

The gear persists per project and survives reinstalls. Custom gears: define [profile.<name>] in .hyperresearch/config.toml (any knob: source targets, loci caps, draft counts, word targets, per-agent models) and profile use <name>.

Run levers: what voice the report is written in

Tiers and gears set how much work happens. Levers set what kind of report comes out, and step 1 picks them from your prompt's verb shape. An explicit directive in your prompt always wins.

The levers render into role-scoped shim files that spawn templates paste verbatim into subagent prompts, so the critics move with the register instead of undoing it. In survey register the dialectic critic flags unfair representation rather than missing commitment, and the polish auditor stops striking hedges. In advocate all of them tighten instead.

The cite-checker and the ship gate receive no shim at all. Verification never softens by mode.

hyperresearch levers set <tag> inference_depth=deep --rerender   # go deeper mid-run
hyperresearch run status -j                                      # see what step 1 chose

The two load-bearing principles

1. Patch, never regenerate. After step 11 produces the synthesized report (or step 10 for light tier), the only modifications are surgical Edit hunks. The patcher and polish auditor are tool-locked to [Read, Edit] at the Claude Code allowlist level so they physically cannot Write a new draft. Per-hunk caps make "just rewrite it" mechanically impossible. Critic findings that don't fit a small hunk escalate as structural issues.

2. Canonical research query is gospel. The verbatim user prompt is persisted to research/runs/<vault_tag>/query.md once and re-read by every subsequent step and every spawned subagent. Wrapper requirements (save paths, citation format, terminal sections) are a separate contract.

Subagent roster

Models are profile config, not hardcode. The table shows the shipped defaults, and you can override any of them in .hyperresearch/config.toml: [profile.full] with models = { fetcher = "haiku" } swaps every fetcher to Haiku