ScienceClaw

Why ScienceClaw?

General-purpose AI assistants are built for everyone. ScienceClaw is built for researchers.

The core idea is simple: an AI that does real scientific work — searching literature, querying databases, running analyses — and gets better at it the more you use it. It remembers your research context across sessions, adapts its skills to your field, and never fabricates a citation.

ScienceClaw is built on the OpenClaw engine, but redesigned from the ground up for academic research.

🧬 Core 1: Self-Evolving Skills

This is ScienceClaw's most important feature.

Most AI tools ship with a fixed set of capabilities. ScienceClaw's skills evolve with you. Every time you complete a research task, the system learns:

What this means in practice:

• Week 1: You study immunology. ScienceClaw learns that PubMed + Semantic Scholar works best for your queries, that you prefer forest plots over tables, and that you always need PMID + DOI in citations.
• Week 4: The system has created specialized skills for your subfield — optimized search templates, preferred statistical methods, database priority chains tuned to immunology literature.
• Month 3: ScienceClaw handles your domain like a trained research assistant. It knows which databases to hit first, which journals matter, and how you like your output formatted.

Compared to standard OpenClaw: OpenClaw ships with ~54 general-purpose skills that don't change. ScienceClaw starts with 285 skills and grows from there — the agent writes new SKILL.md files at runtime without any redeployment.

🧠 Core 2: Research Memory That Persists

Standard AI assistants forget everything when the conversation ends. ScienceClaw doesn't.

What this enables:

• "Continue the literature review we started last Tuesday" — it remembers where you left off
• "Use the same search strategy that worked for the BRCA2 project" — it retrieves past patterns
• Cross-session knowledge accumulation — findings from project A can inform project B
• Smart context pruning — when the context window fills up, it preserves statistical results, effect sizes, and key citations while compacting intermediate steps

Compared to standard OpenClaw: OpenClaw has a basic memory plugin. ScienceClaw adds temporal decay weighting, LanceDB vector storage, and cross-session research pattern retrieval — specifically designed for long-running academic work.

⏱️ Core 3: Built for Long-Duration Research

A real literature review takes hours, not seconds. Most AI tools time out after a few minutes. ScienceClaw is engineered for extended research sessions:

The persistence protocol enforces real research depth. Before ScienceClaw concludes any task, it must verify:

• ✅ Searched at least 3 different databases/sources
• ✅ Retrieved full metadata (not just titles)
• ✅ Cross-referenced findings across sources
• ✅ Checked for contradictory evidence
• ✅ Verified key statistics against primary sources
• ✅ Organized results into a structured output file
• ✅ Met the minimum tool-call threshold for the task type

If any box is unchecked, it keeps working instead of giving you a half-baked answer.

Compared to standard OpenClaw: OpenClaw's default 10-minute timeout is fine for sending messages and setting reminders. ScienceClaw's 1-hour sessions with heartbeat monitoring and mandatory depth enforcement are built for real academic research.

🚫 Core 4: Zero Hallucination

This is the highest-priority rule in the entire system. It's non-negotiable.

The problem: General AI assistants routinely fabricate citations — inventing DOIs, making up author names, citing papers that don't exist. In scientific work, this is catastrophic.

ScienceClaw's approach:

EVERY citation must come from a tool result in the CURRENT conversation.

If a database didn't return it → you can't cite it.
If you're not sure → say "not verified" explicitly.
If you can't find evidence → say so. Don't guess.

No "I think." No "probably." No hallucinated PMIDs.

This is enforced at the protocol level in SCIENCE.md — the 629-line research protocol that governs all agent behavior. It's not a suggestion. It's a hard rule that applies before any other instruction.

Compared to standard OpenClaw: OpenClaw has no special hallucination controls. ScienceClaw's SCIENCE.md protocol treats every factual claim as requiring evidence — the same standard you'd apply to a manuscript under peer review.

🌍 Core 5: All of Science, Not Just Biomedicine

ScienceClaw covers natural sciences AND social sciences across dozens of disciplines:

Natural Sciences

Social Sciences

Cross-Disciplinary Tools

285 skills total — and growing, because the self-evolution system creates new ones as you work.

Compared to standard OpenClaw: OpenClaw has no scientific database integrations. No PubMed, no UniProt, no arXiv, no World Bank. ScienceClaw connects to 25+ academic databases with structured API query skills across all major scientific disciplines.

Quick Start

# Clone
git clone https://github.com/beita6969/ScienceClaw.git
cd ScienceClaw

# One-click setup (installs everything: Node, Python, MCP servers, skills)
chmod +x setup.sh && ./s