by jpicklyk
Server-enforced workflow discipline for AI agents. An MCP server providing persistent work items, dependency graphs, quality gates, and actor attribution. Schemas define what agents must produce — the server blocks the call if they don't. Works with any MCP-compatible client.
# Add to your Claude Code skills
git clone https://github.com/jpicklyk/task-orchestratorGuides for using ai agents skills like task-orchestrator.
Last scanned: 5/30/2026
{
"issues": [],
"status": "PASSED",
"scannedAt": "2026-05-30T15:44:48.310Z",
"npmAuditRan": true,
"pipAuditRan": true
}See how task-orchestrator compares with popular alternatives.
task-orchestrator is an open-source ai agents skill for AI coding assistants such as Claude Code, Codex CLI, and ChatGPT, built by jpicklyk. Server-enforced workflow discipline for AI agents. An MCP server providing persistent work items, dependency graphs, quality gates, and actor attribution. Schemas define what agents must produce — the server blocks the call if they don't. Works with any MCP-compatible client. It has 207 GitHub stars.
Yes. task-orchestrator passed SkillsLLM's automated security scan — a dependency vulnerability audit plus prompt-injection heuristics — with no high-severity issues. You can read the full report in the Security Report section on this page.
Clone the repository with "git clone https://github.com/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator" and add it to your Claude Code skills directory (see the Installation section above).
task-orchestrator is primarily written in Kotlin. It is open-source under jpicklyk on GitHub, so you can review or fork the full source.
Yes. SkillsLLM lists many other AI Agents skills you can browse and compare side by side. Open the AI Agents category from the badge at the top of this page, or use the Related Skills and comparison links further down to weigh task-orchestrator against similar tools.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
⚠️ Third-Party Software Notice
This skill is third-party open-source software developed and hosted independently on GitHub. SkillsLLM is an informational directory and does not control or maintain the underlying repository.
Any security checks, ratings, or warnings displayed by SkillsLLM are automated and limited in scope. They do not constitute a security certification or guarantee that the software is safe, error-free, or free from malicious code, vulnerabilities, compromised dependencies, or prompt-injection risks.
Review the source code, permissions, dependencies, and configuration before installing or running any third-party skill. Use is at your own risk. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, SkillsLLM is not liable for losses arising from third-party software.
Server-enforced workflow discipline for AI agents.
Prompt-based frameworks hope the LLM follows instructions. This one blocks the call if it doesn't.
Task Orchestrator is an MCP server that gives AI coding agents a persistent work item graph with quality gates enforced by the server, not the prompt. It is built for developers running multi-agent or multi-session coding workflows: an orchestrator dispatching sub-agents, a fresh session picking up yesterday's work, or an autonomous loop draining a backlog. It ships as a Docker image, works with any MCP client, and has an optional Claude Code plugin that adds skills and hooks on top.
New here? Start with the illustrated field guide. It explains the ideas on this page in short visual pages, several of them interactive: fire triggers at a phase gate, click a work breakdown through its dependencies, and watch a schema resolve.
Multi-agent workflows need infrastructure the model doesn't provide. When an orchestrator dispatches sub-agents across sessions, there's no built-in way to enforce what documentation must exist before work starts, track which agent made which change, or guarantee dependency ordering across a work breakdown. These are structural concerns — they belong in the server, not in prompts.
Task Orchestrator puts them in the server. If a required design note isn't filled, advance_item returns an error naming the missing note. If an upstream dependency isn't complete, the transition is blocked. Every transition and note records who made it. A new session recovers the full state in one call instead of replaying a conversation. And the rules are YAML config, not hardcoded prompts — change them without changing code.
Morning — new session, new agent, zero context:
Agent: get_context(since="2025-01-14T17:00:00Z")
→ 2 items in work, 1 blocked, 1 stalled (missing implementation-notes)
→ Recent transitions show orchestrator-1 dispatched 3 sub-agents yesterday
→ Full ancestor chains: "Auth Feature > Login API > Input validation"
Agent: advance_item(transitions=[{ itemId: "a3f2", trigger: "start",
actor: { id: "morning-agent", kind: "subagent", parent: "orchestrator-1" } }])
→ Error: "Gate check failed: required notes not filled for queue phase: requirements"
Agent: manage_notes(operation="upsert", notes=[{ itemId: "a3f2", key: "requirements",
body: "Validate email format, enforce password complexity...",
actor: { id: "morning-agent", kind: "subagent" } }])
→ Upserted. noteProgress: { filled: 1, remaining: 0, total: 1 }
Agent: advance_item(transitions=[{ itemId: "a3f2", trigger: "start",
actor: { id: "morning-agent", kind: "subagent" } }])
→ queue → work. Actor recorded. No context rebuilding.
Prerequisite: Docker installed and running.
The simplest setup is a per-session STDIO container: no port, no daemon, no REST API. Add it to your project's .mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"mcp-task-orchestrator": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run", "--rm", "-i",
"-v", "mcp-task-data:/app/data",
"ghcr.io/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator:latest"
]
}
}
}
Claude Code users can register the same shape from the CLI instead:
claude mcp add-json mcp-task-orchestrator '{
"command": "docker",
"args": ["run", "--rm", "-i", "-v", "mcp-task-data:/app/data", "ghcr.io/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator:latest"]
}'
Restart your client. The server creates its SQLite database on first run. Without a config file every tool works in schema-free mode: no gates, no required notes. Add schemas when you want enforcement.
Create .taskorchestrator/config.yaml in your project (see Workflow Enforcement for an example, or use the plugin's /task-orchestrator:manage-schemas skill) and mount that folder into the container:
{
"mcpServers": {
"mcp-task-orchestrator": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run", "--rm", "-i",
"-v", "mcp-task-data:/app/data",
"-v", "/absolute/path/to/your/project/.taskorchestrator:/project/.taskorchestrator:ro",
"-e", "AGENT_CONFIG_DIR=/project",
"ghcr.io/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator:latest"
]
}
}
}
Use an absolute host path. Claude Code's .mcp.json expands only environment variables (${VAR} and ${VAR:-default}), so editor-style placeholders such as ${workspaceFolder} are not substituted. Only the .taskorchestrator/ folder is exposed; the server has no access to the rest of your project.
If you work across several repositories, run one persistent server with the REST API enabled. Each project's .taskorchestrator/config.yaml then syncs into it automatically through the plugin's config-sync hook: no per-project container, no manual mount, and config changes hot-reload without a restart. The plugin's /task-orchestrator:configure-server skill renders this setup interactively; the manual equivalent is:
docker pull ghcr.io/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator:latest
docker run -d --name mcp-task-orchestrator-http --restart unless-stopped \
-v mcp-task-data:/app/data \
-e MCP_TRANSPORT=http -e API_ENABLED=true -e API_AUTH_MODE=none -e API_ALLOW_UNAUTHENTICATED=true \
-p 127.0.0.1:3001:3001 \
ghcr.io/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator:latest
Register it in .mcp.json using the HTTP shape:
{
"mcpServers": {
"mcp-task-orchestrator": {
"type": "http",
"url": "http://localhost:3001/mcp"
}
}
}
And export the client-side variable that tells config-sync where the server is (without it, config-sync silently does nothing):
export TASK_ORCHESTRATOR_API_URL=http://localhost:3001
Alternatively, a client.json (apiUrl only, no token) supplies the URL. Project-mode /task-orchestrator:init writes it beside the project config, only for a loopback server and only as a bare origin with no path, query or fragment (add .taskorchestrator/client.json to .gitignore, the URL is machine-specific); /task-orchestrator:init --user writes the user-level file, which works for any host. The order is the environment variable, then the project-level file, then the user-level file. /task-orchestrator:init sets up a project root for the current directory, and /task-orchestrator:init --user creates a personal root that serves every directory without its own config.
SECURITY: unauthenticated REST means anyone who can reach the port has full read/write/delete access. This is only safe because the port is published loopback-only (
-p 127.0.0.1:3001:3001). Never publish it on0.0.0.0or a wider interface. For shared or networked deployments use bearer tokens or JWKS auth — see Fleet Deployment.
Prefer to run without Docker? CONTRIBUTING.md covers building the fat JAR from source.
Every work item has a role: queue (not started), work (in progress), review (optional, opt-in per schema), blocked (an upstream dependency is unmet), and terminal (done or cancelled). Each role maps to one or more configurable statuses. Agents move items with advance_item(trigger=...) rather than editing status directly, and that call is where every gate is checked. Schemas attach note requirements to roles: a note declared with role: queue must exist before the item can leave the queue phase.
Illustrated: Phase Gates draws the roles and triggers as a track and includes a gate simulator.
Schemas define what agents must produce at each phase, and the server blocks progression until it's done. They also set a planning floor: when an agent enters plan mode, the schema tells it what documentation must exist before implementation can start, shaping the plan itself.
# .taskorchestrator/config.yaml
work_item_schemas:
feature-task:
notes:
- key: requirements
role: queue
required: true
description: "Acceptance criteria before starting"
guidance: "Cover: problem statement, acceptance criteria, alternatives considered, test strategy."
skill: "spec-quality"
- key: implementation-notes
role: work
required: true
description: "What was built and why"
With this schema, advance_item(trigger="start") from queue requires requirements to be filled. The server returns an error listing exactly which notes are missing.
The guidance field provides authoring instructions surfaced at the right moment: when an agent is about to fill that note, the response carries the guidance as a guidancePointer. The skill field goes further, naming a skill the agent should invoke before filling the note so the evaluation follows a defined framework rather than freeform prose.
Traits add cross-cutting note requirements to a